China’s DeepSeek Claims Stunning 545% Daily Profit Margin for AI Models, Shaking Up Global Tech

By Oshadhi Gimesha, Lead Journalist | Editor-in-Chief Approved

Low-Cost AI Breakthrough Sparks Debate Over Silicon Valley’s Spending Spree

In a bombshell disclosure on Saturday, March 1, 2025, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek revealed a theoretical cost-profit ratio of up to 545% per day for its popular V3 and R1 models, sending shockwaves through the global tech industry. Based in Hangzhou, the 20-month-old company shared this eye-popping figure in a GitHub post, marking the first time it’s revealed profit margins from the “inference” tasks—where trained AI models make predictions or handle tasks like chatbots. However, DeepSeek cautioned that actual revenue is “substantially lower” due to pricing structures, free access to some services, and off-peak discounts, leaving investors and rivals reeling amid an already volatile AI market.

Key Points:

• Profit Claim: DeepSeek claims a theoretical daily cost-profit ratio of 545%, with inference costs at $87,072 and potential revenue of $562,027 per day for its V3 and R1 models, equating to over $200 million annually.
• Reality Check: Actual revenue is much lower due to free web/app access, lower V3 costs, and developer discounts during off-peak hours.
• Market Impact: The revelation could further pressure AI stocks outside China, which already plummeted in January after DeepSeek’s models gained global popularity, challenging U.S. giants like OpenAI and Nvidia.

DeepSeek’s AI Edge

DeepSeek’s V3 and R1 models, launched in January 2025, have disrupted the AI landscape by leveraging Nvidia’s lower-capability H800 chips, reportedly costing less than $6 million to train—far below the billions spent by U.S. rivals like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft. The company’s open-source approach and low-cost inference, detailed in its GitHub post, focus on efficiency during the post-training phase, where models like chatbots generate responses or predictions. Posts found on X reflect a mix of awe and skepticism, with some users, like @Forex_Fix, noting, “DeepSeek’s 545% profit claim is wild—can it hold up?” while others, such as @DavidNStocks1, warn, “This could rattle AI stocks again if true.”

Web results highlight DeepSeek’s rise as a “Sputnik moment” for AI, per Silicon Valley exec Marc Andreessen, but also raise doubts about its cost claims. The company’s models, targeting mobile phones, PCs, and laptops (not massive data centers), compete with ChatGPT, Meta’s AI, and Google’s Gemini, per analysts like Daniel Morgan of Synovus Trust. Yet, the establishment narrative—celebrating DeepSeek’s cost-efficiency—may oversimplify. Critics, including some web reports, question whether its $87,072 daily cost and $562,027 revenue figures account for real-world variables, like scaling, maintenance, or competition. DeepSeek’s caution that actual revenue is “substantially lower” suggests the 545% ratio is theoretical, not practical, fueling skepticism among investors.

Global Tech Shake-Up

DeepSeek’s disclosure follows a January 2025 sell-off that erased over $600 billion from Nvidia’s market cap, triggered by its low-cost models’ popularity. The company’s use of H800 chips, which are less advanced than Nvidia’s H100, sidesteps U.S. export controls, per web insights, but raises national security concerns about China’s AI ambitions. Web reports note that DeepSeek’s models outperform some U.S. counterparts on benchmarks, but U.S. firms counter with ongoing investments in advanced chips and data centers, arguing that scale and computing power still matter for AI’s future.

Posts found on X, like @AngelPubStocks’ summary of the 545% claim, show investor unease, with some fearing a price war that could erode U.S. tech giants’ margins. Others see opportunity, per @ThePrintIndia’s focus on DeepSeek’s potential to disrupt, but this sentiment remains inconclusive without broader market data. The establishment narrative—positioning DeepSeek as a threat to U.S. AI dominance—may overstate its immediate impact, given its focus on consumer devices, not data centers, per analysts like CFRA’s Angelo Zino, who argue that demand for high-performance chips persists.

What’s Next for AI’s Cost Race?

DeepSeek’s move could spark a price war, with OpenAI and Google already cutting rates in response, per web reports. However, U.S. firms are doubling down on “agentic AI” and physical AI (e.g., robotics), requiring advanced chips, per CFRA insights. DeepSeek’s recent off-peak pricing cuts (up to 75%, per February 2025 reports) and its rush to launch R2, a successor to R1, signal aggressive growth, but scaling its models globally—especially with data stored in China—faces U.S. regulatory hurdles, per web concerns about national security.

Conclusion: A Game-Changer or Hype?

DeepSeek’s 545% profit claim is a game-changer for AI’s cost structure, but its real-world impact remains unclear. As China challenges Silicon Valley’s AI dominance, News Zier will keep you updated on whether this theoretical ratio reshapes the global tech landscape—or fades as a fleeting shock.

Further Insights:

• Explore more AI industry trends and global tech shifts with News Zier.
• Stay tuned for updates on DeepSeek’s impact and the U.S.-China AI rivalry.

All facts are independently verified, and our reporting is driven by accuracy, transparency, and integrity. Any opinions expressed belong solely to the author. Learn more about our commitment to responsible journalism in our Editorial Policy.