By Oshadhi Gimesha, Lead Journalist | Editor-in-Chief Approved
Prime Minister Ramgoolam Sees Hope, But Challenges Linger for U.S.-UK Base Agreement
Mauritius’ Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam has described U.S. President Donald Trump’s comments as “positive,” signaling Washington’s likely backing of a deal between Britain and Mauritius over the future of the Chagos Islands, home to a strategic U.S.-UK military base on Diego Garcia. Announced on Saturday, March 1, 2025, and reported early Sunday, March 2, Ramgoolam’s statement follows Trump’s indication during a White House meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on February 27, 2025, that he’s inclined to support the agreement. However, lingering uncertainties, including ratification hurdles and regional geopolitics, leave the deal’s fate in question.
Key Points:
- Trump’s Support: Trump signaled at the White House that he’s likely to back the Chagos deal, which is a boost for Starmer but raises questions about U.S. security concerns.
- Mauritius’s Stance: Ramgoolam, elected in November 2024, sees Trump’s comments as a step forward, but the deal, struck in October 2024, remains unsigned and under review.
- Military Base: Britain agreed to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius while retaining a 99-year lease on Diego Garcia, the largest island and site of the U.S.-UK base.
A Deal on the Brink
The October 2024 agreement, initially backed by former U.S. President Joe Biden, aimed to resolve a decades-long dispute by transferring sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius while ensuring the U.S.-UK military base on Diego Garcia remains secure under a 99-year lease. However, the deal has faced scrutiny since Trump’s re-election and Ramgoolam’s rise, with both leaders questioning its terms. Ramgoolam, who criticized the deal as a “sellout” before his election, has softened his stance, calling Trump’s remarks “positive” but emphasizing ongoing negotiations.
Trump’s comments during his February 27 meeting with Starmer—“I think we’ll be inclined to go along with your country, I have a feeling it’s going to work out very well”—mark a shift from earlier concerns raised by his nominee for Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who warned the deal could threaten U.S. security by potentially boosting China’s influence in the Indian Ocean. Posts found on X reflect mixed reactions: some, like @GlobalPolWatch, hailed it as “a win for Britain’s diplomacy,” while others, such as @ChagosRightsNow, voiced concern, “Trump’s backing doesn’t mean Chagossians get a say—where’s our justice?” This sentiment, though inconclusive, highlights ongoing tensions.
The establishment narrative—portraying Trump’s support as a diplomatic breakthrough—may oversimplify. Web reports reveal that some Chagossians, forcibly displaced in the 1960s and 1970s to make way for the Diego Garcia base, criticize the deal for excluding their voices, per protests noted in October 2024 coverage. U.S. national security concerns, particularly Rubio’s fears of Chinese influence on Mauritius, persist, while Ramgoolam’s call for a “speedy resolution” with Britain (as stated in February 2025) suggests urgency but not consensus.
Geopolitical Stakes and Challenges
The Chagos deal’s stakes are high: Diego Garcia’s strategic location in the Indian Ocean supports U.S. and UK military operations, including drone strikes and naval logistics, per web insights. Mauritius, arguing it was illegally forced to cede the islands during its 1968 independence from Britain, sees sovereignty as a matter of justice, but the deal’s 99-year lease raises questions about true control. Web reports note China’s growing presence in the region, including its Belt and Road Initiative ties with Mauritius, fueling U.S. and UK worries, though Mauritius hasn’t joined the initiative, per some analyses.
Britain, under Starmer, has pushed for ratification before Trump’s policies could derail it, but Ramgoolam’s election and Trump’s review add layers of complexity. Posts found on X, like @IndianOceanPol’s mention of “China watching closely,” suggest regional powers are monitoring, but this remains inconclusive without definitive evidence. The deal’s finalization requires a formal treaty, and with Trump’s administration still settling in, delays are likely, per recent diplomatic chatter.
What’s Next for the Chagos Deal?
Ramgoolam’s optimism hinges on Trump’s backing, but challenges remain. The U.S. Congress, particularly Republicans, may scrutinize the deal for security risks, while Mauritius seeks better terms, possibly renegotiating lease details or payments, per February 2025 reports. Britain’s commitment to the 99-year lease and the U.S. military needs could clash with Mauritius’ sovereignty demands, risking a diplomatic standoff.
Conclusion: A Fragile Hope for Resolution
Trump’s positive signals offer hope for the Chagos deal, but unresolved tensions—security, sovereignty, and Chagossian rights—keep it fragile. As Mauritius, Britain, and the U.S. navigate this geopolitical puzzle, News Zier will update you on whether this agreement brings peace or fuels new conflicts in the Indian Ocean.
Further Insights:
- Explore more on global geopolitics and U.S.-UK relations with News Zier.
- Stay tuned for updates on the Chagos Islands deal and its regional impact.
All facts are independently verified, and our reporting is driven by accuracy, transparency, and integrity. Any opinions expressed belong solely to the author. Learn more about our commitment to responsible journalism in our Editorial Policy.