By Oshadhi Gimesha, Lead Journalist | Editor-in-Chief Approved
U.S. Trade Moves Could Backfire on the Very Farmers Trump Aims to Protect
U.S. President Donald Trump’s potential tariffs on South Africa, tied to a controversial land expropriation law, could strip the African nation of its trade privileges under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), risking the livelihoods of the very White farmers Trump seeks to defend. A CNN report on March 2, 2025, warns that losing AGOA benefits—exemption from U.S. tariffs on agricultural exports—could hit South Africa’s citrus industry hard, threatening 35,000 local jobs and 20,000 U.S. jobs tied to citrus imports while also undermining Trump’s stated goal of protecting White farmers.
Key Points:
- Tariff Threat: Trump’s administration is considering revoking South Africa’s AGOA privileges due to its 2025 land expropriation law, potentially imposing a 3% tariff on agricultural exports like citrus.
- Impact on Farmers: The move could hurt White farmers Trump aims to protect, reducing their export earnings and competitiveness in the U.S. market, per experts cited in the report.
- Citrus Crisis: South Africa ships 100,000 pallets of citrus to the U.S. annually, accounting for 9% of its citrus exports, but tariffs could make the fruit costlier for Americans, risking thousands of jobs.
A Tangled Trade Dispute
South Africa’s new land expropriation law, signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa in January 2025, allows the government to seize farmland without compensation in specific cases, aiming to address historical inequalities from apartheid. This has enraged Trump, who froze $440 million in U.S. aid on February 8, 2025, claiming it discriminates against White farmers, and now threatens further sanctions, including AGOA revocation, per web reports. Posts found on X reflect the tension, with some, like @DafiniNJ, noting, “U.S.-South Africa rift grows over land law—Trump’s tariffs could tank exports,” while others, such as @BS22Take2, question, “How is this ‘putting America first’ if it hurts farmers Trump wants to save?” This sentiment, treated as inconclusive, shows public confusion and concern.
🇺🇸US- 🇿🇦South Africa rift grows over land expropriation law. Trump cuts $440M in aid, threatens more sanctions, targeting ANC leaders. AGOA trade benefits at risk, straining ties https://t.co/WxK2C4ScOF pic.twitter.com/wrdAsnAqph
— Dafini Nelson-Jaja🇳🇬 (@DafiniNJ) March 2, 2025
The establishment narrative—framing Trump’s move as protecting White farmers—may oversimplify. Experts like Chrispin Phiri, a spokesperson for South Africa’s foreign minister, argue that stripping AGOA benefits would “hurt the same White farmers Trump seeks to protect,” according to CNN. South Africa’s citrus industry, a key AGOA beneficiary, sends 100,000 pallets annually to the U.S., sustaining 35,000 local jobs and 20,000 U.S. jobs, per Justin Chadwick of the Citrus Growers’ Association, cited in the report. A 3% tariff could make South African citrus pricier for Americans, reducing demand and threatening exports, while forcing South Africa to pivot to markets like the Middle East and EU, where absorption capacity is limited, per Agbiz data.
Ramaphosa, responding to Trump’s threats, told Goldman Sachs’ Richard Gnodde on February 27, 2025, “We want to do a meaningful deal with the U.S. on a range of issues,” signaling willingness to negotiate, per web reports. But Trump’s focus on land seizures—denied by Ramaphosa, who insists no land has been confiscated—clashes with South Africa’s constitutional land reform since 1994, addressing Black land ownership disparities, according to CNN and web insights. Posts found on X, like @UncoverTheNews and @EThompsonWV, echo CNN’s reporting but add little clarity, treated as inconclusive.
Economic Fallout and Geopolitical Tensions
Losing AGOA, which covers 42% of South Africa’s agricultural exports to Africa but 6% to the Americas in 2024, could slash foreign exchange earnings, per Agbiz, and hit Black and White farmers alike, per Phiri. Web reports note South Africa’s citrus is valued in markets like the EU and Middle East, but absorbing the U.S. volume—9% of total citrus exports—elsewhere is “difficult,” per Chadwick, risking job losses and supply chain disruptions. Trump’s tariffs, part of a broader campaign hitting Mexico, Canada, and China, could ignite a trade war, per CNN and web analyses, raising U.S. consumer prices and slowing growth, per EY’s Gregory Daco’s 2025 estimates.
The narrative—portraying Trump’s tariffs as a defense of White farmers—may backfire. White South Africans demonstrated support for Trump on February 15, 2025, per CNN, but critics, like Bloemfontein resident David Van Wyk, called him “completely ignorant” of South Africa’s land inequality, per web reports. Posts found on X, like @DaanBarnard’s warning of “billions in exports at risk,” suggest economic stakes, but this remains inconclusive without data on actual trade impacts.
What’s Next for South Africa-U.S. Ties?
Ramaphosa’s offer to “do a deal” could lead to negotiations, but Trump’s hardline stance—evident in his February 3, 2025, aid freeze and tariff threats—complicates matters. Web reports note that the U.S. Congress is debating AGOA revocation, per @DaanBarnard’s X post, risking diplomatic ties. South Africa’s economy, already strained by power cuts and coalition chaos, per @BrndonJoubert, could face further pressure if tariffs hit, according to CNN.
Conclusion: A Risky Trade Move
Trump’s potential tariffs on South Africa could protect White farmers in theory, but experts warn they’d hurt them in practice, threatening citrus exports and jobs on both sides. As U.S.-South Africa ties hang in the balance, News Zier will keep you updated on whether this trade dispute deepens or finds a path to resolution.
Further Insights:
- Explore more on U.S. trade policy and African economic trends with News Zier.
- Stay tuned for updates on South Africa’s AGOA status and Trump’s tariff impacts.
All facts are independently verified, and our reporting is driven by accuracy, transparency, and integrity. Any opinions expressed belong solely to the author. Learn more about our commitment to responsible journalism in our Editorial Policy.